- May 1, 2005
- 4,439
- 1,735
- Awards
- 12
- First Name
- Jeff
I don't even remember how I can across this post by Tim Martells over on JD Rucker's SOSHABLE blog but WOW!
Tim is going on a RANT and calling industry services OUT on their SEO reporting. Basically, sorta calling them liars and criminals.
The Shocking Truth Behind Reporting In The Automotive Community
I'm not sure of the validity behind his rant or if this is nothing more than an elaborate sales pitch on his end. Either way with words like some of the below quotes from the post, it's hard to ignore.
" For the record, I think this is a wonderful website provider. Their technology is awesome and the ease of use of their products is without peer. But… they are LYING to their customers and this is unacceptable."
"I found that nearly ALL of the keywords being tracked and touted as success had a whopping monthly search volume of… wait for it… ZERO"
"What a monumental task to take on 585 keywords and obtain page 1 rankings in a single month! But what did I find? 583 of those 585 keywords had NEVER been searched. ZERO MONTHLY SEARCH VOLUME. THIS IS CRIMINAL! You are taking a dealer’s money and returning NO VALUE! How can you do that!?"
Oh - and he called out the different industry awards as being full of BS.
"I mean, CarMercial is littered with awards on their website (most which I guess were bought from AutoSuccess) but to see a PCG Digital Marketing AWA award on there really turned my stomach."
Tim finishes his rant recommending that dealers require the following 3 criteria from their SEO company's monthly reporting..
• Keyword Positioning
• Search Volume for each ranking keyword
• Link to every page of content, press release, slideshare, and link that was built, etc.
Click here to read his full rant!
I'm note sure if all of this justifies as criminal behavioral. But I do agree that SEO is an oversold and under performed service on our industry and rarely reported as it should be.
Question and Poll for the DR Community.
On a scale of 1-5 - How much do you trust your SEO provider and their provided reports?
1 being I have NO trust
5 being I have Complete trust
Tim is going on a RANT and calling industry services OUT on their SEO reporting. Basically, sorta calling them liars and criminals.
The Shocking Truth Behind Reporting In The Automotive Community
I'm not sure of the validity behind his rant or if this is nothing more than an elaborate sales pitch on his end. Either way with words like some of the below quotes from the post, it's hard to ignore.
" For the record, I think this is a wonderful website provider. Their technology is awesome and the ease of use of their products is without peer. But… they are LYING to their customers and this is unacceptable."
"I found that nearly ALL of the keywords being tracked and touted as success had a whopping monthly search volume of… wait for it… ZERO"
"What a monumental task to take on 585 keywords and obtain page 1 rankings in a single month! But what did I find? 583 of those 585 keywords had NEVER been searched. ZERO MONTHLY SEARCH VOLUME. THIS IS CRIMINAL! You are taking a dealer’s money and returning NO VALUE! How can you do that!?"
Oh - and he called out the different industry awards as being full of BS.
"I mean, CarMercial is littered with awards on their website (most which I guess were bought from AutoSuccess) but to see a PCG Digital Marketing AWA award on there really turned my stomach."
Tim finishes his rant recommending that dealers require the following 3 criteria from their SEO company's monthly reporting..
• Keyword Positioning
• Search Volume for each ranking keyword
• Link to every page of content, press release, slideshare, and link that was built, etc.
Click here to read his full rant!
I'm note sure if all of this justifies as criminal behavioral. But I do agree that SEO is an oversold and under performed service on our industry and rarely reported as it should be.
Question and Poll for the DR Community.
On a scale of 1-5 - How much do you trust your SEO provider and their provided reports?
1 being I have NO trust
5 being I have Complete trust
Last edited: