- May 1, 2006
- 3,519
- 2,442
- Awards
- 12
- First Name
- Alex
Everyday more and more of the people I followed or friended are doing less and less on twitter and Facebook. I've noticed that twitter has a strong following amongst a small minority of my friends and Facebook seems to be a draw mostly for events and groups. I have to hand it to Facebook - they're still doing things to improve the service for everyday users :thumbup:
I am noticing a trend that occurred with MySpace where friends' activities dwindled until very few were still messing with it. And I'm surprised twitter and Facebook have maintained the presence they have this long. Personally I still like them and will continue to use them, but I am noticing the trend that I saw years ago with MySpace.
One of my favorite bloggers has another take on it:
I am noticing a trend that occurred with MySpace where friends' activities dwindled until very few were still messing with it. And I'm surprised twitter and Facebook have maintained the presence they have this long. Personally I still like them and will continue to use them, but I am noticing the trend that I saw years ago with MySpace.
One of my favorite bloggers has another take on it:
Bob Lefsetz said:Twitter....
t's toast. Over. Done. History. Soon to be as behind the curve as Facebook, someday completely forgotten like Friendster.
Huh?
It's the cacophony.
You see there are too many people on the service. As a result, very few are heard. It's happened over the past six months, tweeting is like a stone in a waterfall, or more accurately, pissing in the wind. In other words, if you tweet and nobody reads it have you wasted your time?
Today Rick Warren tweeted something I wrote. He's got in excess of a million followers. The fact that I can reach him stuns me. But despite his only tweeting twice since then, the retweets have not gone nuclear. Oh, there are plenty, a double digit number, nineteen to be exact, but if it had been six months ago, I'd be a hero at the Saddleback Church.
But now...
Twitter is becoming just like the rest of the world, a haven of winners and losers. Either you're a star with an eight digit following and people are interested in what you have to say or...you're ignored.
Interestingly, those in demand, those followed, those who have their words eaten up are musicians, if they'd only realize their power and stop selling out to the man and focus on the music itself, unlike Jay-Z.
But musicians don't have to tweet to get their story across... Twitter is not the only platform that allows them to do this.
You see everybody wants to be a star and nobody's got time to follow a million people. Just can't be done. Furthermore, we don't even want to.
Everything you hear is wrong. All this hogwash about algorithms and recommendations. Have you experienced Spotify's new homepage? Right now, it says if I like Michael Bolton to check out Shania Twain. Isn't that like saying if you like Cliff Richard to check out Loretta Lynn?
Yes, Spotify's new service is laughable. Because Spotify doesn't care about music, but money.
And the founders of Twitter don't care about communication, but cash.
And the public is not beholden to any of these services. Which is why the story of the Internet is a few services that stick and a ton that disappear.
Why is this?
It turns out services are like bands. There are a few superstars and a ton of one hit wonders. And why no one else can see this is beyond me....truncated newsletter. Further reading will be available here: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/ under the title of "twitter"