# Summary An Autobase ILM user seeks feedback from peers about restructuring the lead bucket system to better match their dealership's workflow, but encounters pushback from Autobase vendor representatives who defend the existing bucket structure and suggest the current system works well when used properly. The thread reveals tension between user customization requests and vendor recommendations, with the original poster ultimately defending their dealership's strong performance (17% conversion rate, 102 internet sales in March 2010) while acknowledging the bucket system's integral role in their process, though still expressing reservations about its design.
# Summary An Autobase ILM user seeks feedback from peers about restructuring the lead bucket system to better match their dealership's workflow, but encounters pushback from Autobase vendor representatives who defend the existing bucket structure and suggest the current system works well when used properly. The thread reveals tension between user customization requests and vendor recommendations, with the original poster ultimately defending their dealership's strong performance (17% conversion rate, 102 internet sales in March 2010) while acknowledging the bucket system's integral role in their process, though still expressing reservations about its design.