- Apr 12, 2019
- 30
- 16
- First Name
- Jacques
I remember that actually.Right! Matt Watson promised that.
I remember that actually.Right! Matt Watson promised that.
Vinsolutions has supposedly been developing a fix for this that looks at all of the duplicate leads as 1 unified opportunity to sell a car.
However, the update keeps getting delayed, year after year.
I disagree - that would make desking, and keeping track of notes much more of a pain. As it is, if you merge records, you are likely to lose any desked deals for that customer record.Vin Solutions needs to mark the first lead as bad and let the freshest lead be the one that is worked. If they have been looking more since the first lead was sent in it shows that they are more likely to buy.
That looks very BOT-ish. Are you selling overseas?Well... I wonder where this MoFo is at in his digital journey?
PS: This is just Today
PSS: This isn't all of his leads. I got tired of coping and pasting.
View attachment 4868
View attachment 4869
View attachment 4870
# Summary Automotive dealers debate whether duplicate leads—where the same prospect submits multiple inquiries across different channels or platforms—should be viewed negatively (as waste to be refunded) or positively (as a signal of genuine buyer intent and engagement). The consensus among participants is that duplicates represent heightened customer interest and actually correlate with higher closing rates, but CRM systems continue to penalize them in reporting due to legacy automation designed for cost recovery. The thread highlights a disconnect between how CRMs were originally configured and the reality of modern digital sales, where multiple touchpoints shouldn't trigger lead suppression but rather unified opportunity management.