- Feb 11, 2015
- 2,491
- 757
- First Name
- Alex
@Jlewis74 I am floored that the NADA didn't, hasn't, and isn't doing anything to stop it. That's what a dealer association is for
@Jlewis74 If 75% of ReyRey and CDK dealers banned together to do this they could bring these companies to their knees
Pros & cons for all options, CDK accounting is much more robust, than that in DealerTrack. DT is super simple to use though.I have had Dealertrack in my Ford store for a year and a half. Very satisfied. In fact I am putting it in another Ford store I am purchasing the first of the year. We will save 2/3rds of what the current owner is paying for R&R with better customer service more functionality. I also looked at Autosoft. I've heard some good things about them and could have saved a little more. But didn't want to switch two stores. Why anyone would pay for R&R or CDK for a one or two store operation is beyond me. We will save aprox $50k a year.
# Summary Frustrated with reliability and cost issues at Rey Rey and CDK, a former DMS vendor representative recommends switching to alternative providers like Auto/Mate or AutoSoft, claiming the transition is manageable for most dealers and results in significant savings. Responses reveal that while smaller dealers could realistically make the switch, enterprise-level transitions carry substantial risks (citing Hendrick's failed CDK migration), and OEM compatibility issues may limit viable alternatives. A CDK outage during the thread further validates frustrations, though the discussion highlights that switching DMS systems, despite theoretical benefits, remains a complex undertaking for most dealerships.