- Dec 2, 2009
- 1,058
- 746
- Awards
- 9
- First Name
- John
View attachment 744
There's my answer on the stupid controversy!
Ed, I read DR on my phone. Guess I have to borrow a phone with a scanner to see what you mean??
View attachment 744
There's my answer on the stupid controversy!
Ed, I read DR on my phone. Guess I have to borrow a phone with a scanner to see what you mean??
I have followed this thread and I would like to share an idea with you. What about scan to chat? Scan to text? We are in beta right now for a text to chat and a QR to text (dealer) feature. Basically the dealer can chat with consumers from their Contact At Once chat solution with someone from a mobile device. This is individual sales person to shopper. As for me, I don't want a mass text from a dealer....ever! But if while I was in the shopping process and I was working with a dealer and they asked if they could text correspondence to me, I would say yes.
What about "Scan Here To Chat" or "Scan Here To Text"? It is a call to action but at least when you scan it there is action. Imagine someone reading the paper (I know its hard) and they see an add. In the add it says "Scan Here To Chat With Sales".
Read about it....Contact At Once! Announces SMS Text Feature To Improve Response Rates for Automotive Advertising « ContactAtOnce
Still "In" for me.
# Summary Automotive industry professionals debate the practical value of QR codes for dealership use, with most participants skeptical about their effectiveness despite acknowledging potential niche applications. While supporters like Jason suggest creative implementations (such as service reminders or coupon redemption) could work, the overwhelming consensus is that QR codes are a fad with limited real-world adoption due to user friction, poor execution by companies, and disappointing engagement metrics. The thread reveals a fundamental gap between the technology's promise and its actual utility in dealer operations and customer interactions.