• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

Why “Uber for X” startups failed: The supply side is king

AI Summary

# Summary The thread discusses an article analyzing why most "Uber for X" startups failed despite initial hype and funding, with the key insight being that supply-side economics—not demand—is the critical factor determining success. The analysis uses rideshare as a counterexample, noting that Uber's model works because drivers can work flexible hours and generate consistent demand, creating better unit economics than most other service categories attempted by copycat startups. The thread explores why acquiring and retaining service providers becomes prohibitively expensive and difficult for most "Uber for X" businesses compared to the rideshare model.

Alexander Lau

Banned
Feb 11, 2015
2,491
757
First Name
Alex
Why “Uber for X” startups failed: The supply side is king
https://andrewchen.co/why-uber-for-x-failed/

Remember all the “Uber for x” startups?
A few years ago a ton of “Uber for x” startups got funded, but very few of them – maybe none? – worked out. It sounds good but ultimately most failed on the supply side. Let’s explore why.

Rideshare has better economics, at the same acquisition cost
Rideshare is special. Acquiring a broad base of labor for driving is expensive, often $300+. But then they can get requests all day. You can work 20 hours and even 50 hours a week if you want. You continually need the driver app to find new customers

Where a lot of “Uber for x” companies fall down – valet parking, car washing, massages, etc – is that demand is often infrequent and there’s spikes at a few points in the day. What’s your supply side supposed to do the rest of the time?

In other words, “Uber for x” cos often have the same cost of acquisition and cost of labor as rideshare, but can’t fill their time with work as smoothly / profitably.
 

✨ AI Highlights

# Summary The thread discusses an article analyzing why most "Uber for X" startups failed despite initial hype and funding, with the key insight being that supply-side economics—not demand—is the critical factor determining success. The analysis uses rideshare as a counterexample, noting that Uber's model works because drivers can work flexible hours and generate consistent demand, creating better unit economics than most other service categories attempted by copycat startups. The thread explores why acquiring and retaining service providers becomes prohibitively expensive and difficult for most "Uber for X" businesses compared to the rideshare model.

Replies Views 0 1,186 Started Last Reply