I think what you have is a classic case of the wrong leads........ http://forum.dealerrefresh.com/<object width=
Last edited by a moderator:
Scott brings up great points, but the thing that struck me as soon as I clicked thru to your ATC DDA (Dynamic Display Ad) was this car image:So autotrader is sending you leads from here? Red Wing Chevrolet | Specials | Red Wing Car Dealer | Honda Civic
.
Are you selling or marketing in your responses? If you're selling then you're giving up too much information. Selling, by the way, should only be done on a sales floor. Marketing is spiking curiosity to push people to the next step. It is a tough transition if you come out of sales, but a sales person who gives too much information or "talks himself out of a deal" is exactly what you don't want in an Internet department.
Very simple lead response formula:
2 sentences of response + 1 question at the end that can't be answered with a yes/no = more responses and higher gross
Approach email responses as marketing and stop selling!
# Summary A P&I Manager frustrated with high volumes of unresponsive and invalid leads from third-party providers like AutoTrader seeks advice on improving sales. Respondents offer varied perspectives: some suggest the dealership's processes and marketing approach may be the issue rather than lead quality, others recommend requesting replacements for bad contact information from lead providers, and one contributor advises against over-selling in initial responses. The thread reveals a common industry tension between lead volume and lead quality, with the emerging consensus that dealer processes, follow-up strategy, and how leads are sourced/categorized in the CRM may matter as much as the lead provider itself.