- Oct 29, 2009
- 727
- 825
- Awards
- 8
- First Name
- Rick
...The problem with creating these lists, most dealers aren't you. They don't have a you internally...
All for the useful info, but I suppose I'm used to a different format or a perceived format within a forum. I just think it's smarter to create a thread with a clear title for each issue, not a singular individual's thread and then sub posts within it. I think it dilutes the extent to which is can be used and why should I post in a Ryan thread if I have relevant info on the subject? Should I create my own thread on a subject or issue? Doesn't that duplicate the effort? I dig in the dB and on Google (thanks @Rick Buffkin = https://cse.google.com/cse/publicurl?cx=018437389317799583975:yppyxfo7p-g) for relevant threads before posting new content, for sake of de-duplication.FYI: Last week at DD and DS, I met dozens of players that would find Ryan's posts very useful (plus, this is the spirit of DR). @Alexander Lau you're highly skilled in these matters, why not create a thread and create a thread that's a brain dump?
Again, much of this has been repeated throughout a ton of threads in this database. Access is always a problem, especially with agencies that have something to hide or don't want to play nice with other 3rd parties, as part of their paranoia. It's a lot easier to add it to a thread that has a title related to the subject (Google Analytics issues...) and for more pertinent.Love this thread. I'll add Access as one of the best ways of not getting "Forked" by vendors. And for a lot of dealers, that's a problem, because their vendors will not give them access to the reporting available in their accounts. And for good reason, if dealers saw how badly they were managing these accounts, they would fire these vendors immediately.
All too often dealers don't have their own Google Ads accounts that they control. Their vendors usually create an account for them and then restrict access to it to hide ineptitude and over charging.
Most dealers are not aware that they can create their own Google Ads account that they own and control so that they have full access that they can have a vendor manage under their MCC master client manager account.
If a vendor refuses to do this, you're going to get "Forked."
Sheena, you're getting FORKED!This thread motivated me to reach out see everyones throughts on my vendor.. I am fairly new to all this and have just recently gained access to our Google Ads Account...
I have been worried that we weren't getting the best bang for our buck with our PPC vendor for Google Ads. After analyzing our account and realizing we were appearing for irrelevant searches, I had asked for her to organize and optimize our campaigns. Her response: please send me what you would like changed.
After I had sent her a novel of every little thing that i thought should be updated/changed, she fixed it within a couple days. (She added a couple keywords of 'new for escape' rather than Ford...)The next monthly phone, she had explained that our budget isn't going to spend as much as it did last month and that the words were too specific.and reverted the changes.
I asked why 3/5 campaigns were on accelerated delivery and she explained that they had to be on accelerated in order to spend...
She suggested turning our OEM campaign into a dealer general campaign...I agreed. However, I noticed that both campaigns with the same keywords, ads, targeting, etc were both running. After asking if its worth it, she explained that we need to have the other campaign along with of our OEM campaign incase our OEM budget runs out. I gave it a couple days and noticed that we were spending a significant amount less in the OEM campaign - She gets back to me a week later and ensures me that our OEM campaign will be spending over the other campaign
... However, Our OEM campaign has still only spent $105 and our other Dealer General campaign has spend $484.
Is this normal? Should we be concerned?