- May 1, 2005
- 4,439
- 1,735
- Awards
- 12
- First Name
- Jeff
Different sides of the camp. I understand both but I'm sure I lean more to one side.
The question is do you NEED to have TrueCar in your marketing/lead mix and if you don't are you truly losing out?
That's like saying you NEED to have eBay, AutoBytel, AutoTrader, SEO, Paid Search or any channel for that matter. It comes down to your marketing mix and execution accordingly.
Many forget about the legacy side of TrueCar still known as Zag. A lot of dealers report great results and love the legacy program.
I believe when the name TrueCar gets thrown around by many, they're referencing the TrueCar website, the leads derived solely from and the whole debacle around DMS data and Scott Painter's "initial" attitude toward dealers and this business as a whole.
Some say you're "feeding the beast". And if you're going to do this, then quit bitching about a lower cost per sale and profit - as many dealers do. Each dealer/company has a decision in where to place their marketing dollars and acquire leads from.
Does a dealer NEED to have TrueCar in their mix? For the sake of the legacy leads, depending on location - I can understand why some do or feel as if they do.
Are these lazy dealers? I wouldn't say that.
I understand where Jerry is coming from and unless you're in a consultant role and see how costly a break in process can be, it can be hard to rationalize. Dealers will quickly spend more money for a few months in order to obtain more opportunities and possible sales. From Jerry's point of view (and he is right), you're losing great opportunities that you already have in front of you each day with POOR processes. Especially on the phone.
Dealers on average LOSE more opportunities a day to sell a car than what they gain, due to poor phone skills alone (and showroom skills for that matter).
BUT rather than fixing the process, training their people and holding them responsible for their job, dealers would rather pony up a few dollars and buy their way into more opportunities.
Lets ask ourselves and be honest - is this the lazy way out?
Of course IT IS!
Side note:
No matter how you slice it, you're paying a company to sell you opportunities. They're taking your money (and data) to grow. This particular company has a track record and someone at the helm on a mission to change the industry and the way consumers buy their vehicles.
Does the industry need to change? Let's agree in many levels it does. Is this a company you want to support in possibly doing so? Only you can answer that. I know my answer.
The question is do you NEED to have TrueCar in your marketing/lead mix and if you don't are you truly losing out?
That's like saying you NEED to have eBay, AutoBytel, AutoTrader, SEO, Paid Search or any channel for that matter. It comes down to your marketing mix and execution accordingly.
Many forget about the legacy side of TrueCar still known as Zag. A lot of dealers report great results and love the legacy program.
I believe when the name TrueCar gets thrown around by many, they're referencing the TrueCar website, the leads derived solely from and the whole debacle around DMS data and Scott Painter's "initial" attitude toward dealers and this business as a whole.
Some say you're "feeding the beast". And if you're going to do this, then quit bitching about a lower cost per sale and profit - as many dealers do. Each dealer/company has a decision in where to place their marketing dollars and acquire leads from.
Does a dealer NEED to have TrueCar in their mix? For the sake of the legacy leads, depending on location - I can understand why some do or feel as if they do.
Are these lazy dealers? I wouldn't say that.
I understand where Jerry is coming from and unless you're in a consultant role and see how costly a break in process can be, it can be hard to rationalize. Dealers will quickly spend more money for a few months in order to obtain more opportunities and possible sales. From Jerry's point of view (and he is right), you're losing great opportunities that you already have in front of you each day with POOR processes. Especially on the phone.
Dealers on average LOSE more opportunities a day to sell a car than what they gain, due to poor phone skills alone (and showroom skills for that matter).
BUT rather than fixing the process, training their people and holding them responsible for their job, dealers would rather pony up a few dollars and buy their way into more opportunities.
Lets ask ourselves and be honest - is this the lazy way out?
Of course IT IS!
Side note:
No matter how you slice it, you're paying a company to sell you opportunities. They're taking your money (and data) to grow. This particular company has a track record and someone at the helm on a mission to change the industry and the way consumers buy their vehicles.
Does the industry need to change? Let's agree in many levels it does. Is this a company you want to support in possibly doing so? Only you can answer that. I know my answer.