- Apr 15, 2011
- 21
- 4
- First Name
- William
That's a fantastic outlook.
Humans are messy and saying they're not doing their job at <300 is too.
In your math I find it odd that you don't consider time for training, meetings, conversations with the desk or management on price presentations, coaching time with a supervisor, product research, strategy development, template creation, etc...
I could force the list to go at least 100 items deep but the point is this, these are human beings, not robots.
Does this make me weak in not being able to lead my team to that level? I HOPE SO, i'd love to take them there, truly!
I would love to align with you and have them effectively work 300 leads however I've never seen it done even close to what I would consider an OK closing percentage (15%) let along good (20%).
I've have seen more than a few stores who cram 300/leads/mo end up around 5%-7% closing.
At this point all I smell is a bullshit argument that hasn't been battle tested.
I hope this is like the 4 minute mile and you can invoke the Bannister effect!

Although I have been able to achieve and maintain above a 15% closing ratio with our BDC, it definitely wasn't with handling 300 fresh internet and phone leads a month! Quantity vs quality IMO...
I will say that the ELEAD call center is able to achieve some crazy numbers through lots of technological adaptations and whatnot over the last couple decades that strength in a large number of agents allows. Otherwise, I haven't walked in a BDC to date that that could handle 300 leads per agent every month unless it's campaign leads with a low amount of contacts per lead. It seems like quality of lead handling, and therefore appts set/shown/sold decreases with that large number of fresh phone and internet leads.