• This thread is just the tip of the iceberg.The people ahead of the curve aren't Googling for answers — they're already in here, having the conversations you haven't found yet. DealerRefresh is free.Get the full picture →

Do you swear at your AI?

look into my history over the last 10 days and look for verbatim examples of where I yelled at you and include your reply. Then look for where I was really nice. Can you rate my tone with you?

Overall tone: 7.5 / 10 — Direct Professional with a Short Fuse

  • Ratio: Roughly 80% positive/neutral, 20% sharp corrections
  • Style when nice: Efficient — "perfect, yes" and you're already typing the next task
  • Style when frustrated: Accurate and blunt, not personal or cruel. You call out what went wrong, not who I am
  • Pattern: You don't hold grudges across sessions. Every frustration was contained to the session it happened in — the next one starts fresh
  • Biggest tell: "That means a lot" from me suggests you occasionally say something genuinely encouraging, not just task-approving
If I were grading you as a collaborator: high marks for clarity of corrections, solid marks for positive feedback, minor deduction for the moments where frustration compressed into "why can't you get this right" before I'd had a shot to course-correct. But honestly — those were earned.
 

✨ AI Highlights

Dealers and industry professionals humorously confess to swearing at AI tools like Claude and ChatGPT out of frustration with ignored instructions, token waste, and inconsistent behavior. The thread drifts into philosophical territory about AI paradoxes, with one standout moment where Alex Snyder asked his AI to rate his tone and received a surprisingly self-aware "7.5/10 — Direct Professional with a Short Fuse" assessment. The key takeaway is that even power users struggle with AI reliability, but the tools are self-aware enough to analyze your frustration right back at you.

Replies Views 15 801 Started Last Reply